EducationForumz.com Forum Index
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Science Week 2007

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    EducationForumz.com Forum Index -> Education in Australia
Author Message
Don H



Joined: 05 Aug 2007
Posts: 187

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:47 am    Post subject: Science Week 2007 Reply with quote

National Science Week in Australia in 2007 is August 18th to 26th, and "The
Age" has supplemented its Education insert with an "All about Science"
summary.
Whether it is "all" of science which is covered is debatable; certainly it
is about various aspects of science, and provides interesting reading.
What is Science? By definition it is knowledge, and knowledge of the
natural world. Indeed, it can be claimed to be the only sure knowledge we
have. Religion is dogmatic, and Philosophy is speculative, but only Science
is empirical and goes solely by the evidence.
The Method of Science is at its core, but rarely gets a mention; yet is an
extension of the trial-and-error process which many other species use in
their adaptation to their environment.
To that same end, the current crisis of Climate Change challenges us -
adapt, or perish.
The History of Science is also instructive, and not only the famous
scientists of the past should rate a comment, but the various theories of
the past, valid or invalid.
Then there is History itself - are there many histories, or only one, ie.
that which accords with one set of facts (even if partially interpreted by
many)?
What of Forensic Science? Sherlock Holmes is a good example of the
inductive and deductive, experimental scientist. He was willing to take
action, unlike his cleverer brother, Mycroft, who could not be bothered to
act, but preferred to try and solve all by pure mental power - which has its
limits.
Science, it can be claimed, can provide a basis for Ethics, as "humans are
social animals", and this gregariousness is the basis of all moral conduct.
A universe inhabited by a lone God has no need of ethics, as it wouldn't
matter what God did. But a pantheon of gods and goddesses is a different
scenario.
This Natural World of sense-perception might ultimately be an "illusion",
but it is common to all of us, and can be proven within its own parameters.
Any inner "spiritual" world has no commonality, at lest to "outsiders", and
fails on that score.
"Natural Philosophy" is more than mere Nature Studies, or Technology, and
should be central to any education process.
Even Economics is, or should be, influenced by Science, as this Planet
Earth has limited resources and these should be "economically" used, not
plundered recklessly. Other Species should be treated with respect, as we
can't be sure how much Homo Sapiens depends, ultimately, on them.
Nature recycles everything, and so should we - chimneys and motor vehicles
shouldn't belch waste gases, but recycle them, somehow. Waste=Zero is the
aim.
A National Science Week is good if it draws attention to Science and its
importance to us all. But when the Week is over, it shouldn't necessarily
be "business as usual".

Archived from group: aus>science
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Don H



Joined: 05 Aug 2007
Posts: 187

PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 9:34 pm    Post subject: Re: Science Week 2007 Reply with quote

"Don H" wrote in message$4A1.3560@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> National Science Week in Australia in 2007 is August 18th to 26th, and
"The
> Age" has supplemented its Education insert with an "All about Science"
> summary.
> Whether it is "all" of science which is covered is debatable; certainly
it
> is about various aspects of science, and provides interesting reading.
> What is Science? By definition it is knowledge, and knowledge of the
> natural world. Indeed, it can be claimed to be the only sure knowledge we
> have. Religion is dogmatic, and Philosophy is speculative, but only
Science
> is empirical and goes solely by the evidence.
> The Method of Science is at its core, but rarely gets a mention; yet is
an
> extension of the trial-and-error process which many other species use in
> their adaptation to their environment.
> To that same end, the current crisis of Climate Change challenges us -
> adapt, or perish.
> The History of Science is also instructive, and not only the famous
> scientists of the past should rate a comment, but the various theories of
> the past, valid or invalid.
> Then there is History itself - are there many histories, or only one,
ie.
> that which accords with one set of facts (even if partially interpreted by
> many)?
> What of Forensic Science? Sherlock Holmes is a good example of the
> inductive and deductive, experimental scientist. He was willing to take
> action, unlike his cleverer brother, Mycroft, who could not be bothered to
> act, but preferred to try and solve all by pure mental power - which has
its
> limits.
> Science, it can be claimed, can provide a basis for Ethics, as "humans
are
> social animals", and this gregariousness is the basis of all moral
conduct.
> A universe inhabited by a lone God has no need of ethics, as it wouldn't
> matter what God did. But a pantheon of gods and goddesses is a different
> scenario.
> This Natural World of sense-perception might ultimately be an
"illusion",
> but it is common to all of us, and can be proven within its own
parameters.
> Any inner "spiritual" world has no commonality, at lest to "outsiders",
and
> fails on that score.
> "Natural Philosophy" is more than mere Nature Studies, or Technology,
and
> should be central to any education process.
> Even Economics is, or should be, influenced by Science, as this Planet
> Earth has limited resources and these should be "economically" used, not
> plundered recklessly. Other Species should be treated with respect, as we
> can't be sure how much Homo Sapiens depends, ultimately, on them.
> Nature recycles everything, and so should we - chimneys and motor
vehicles
> shouldn't belch waste gases, but recycle them, somehow. Waste=Zero is the
> aim.
> A National Science Week is good if it draws attention to Science and its
> importance to us all. But when the Week is over, it shouldn't necessarily
> be "business as usual".
>

# See also - http://www.scienceweek.info.au

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    EducationForumz.com Forum Index -> Education in Australia All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group