Insults to Australian people Intelligence

Abu-Alwafa · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 23

In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.

Insults to Australian people Intelligence

Australian intelligence on Iraq 'a clear dishonesty'

¥ This is the same 'intelligence' that the U.S and Britian used

Australian case for Iraq war was 'fabricated'

¥ So was the U.S and British case.

http://www.uscrusade.com/

Archived from group: aus>education

The Enlightenment · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 8

"Abu-Alwafa" wrote in message$f7.95199@localhost...
> In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
>
> Insults to Australian people Intelligence
>
> Australian intelligence on Iraq 'a clear dishonesty'
>
> ¥ This is the same 'intelligence' that the U.S and Britian used
>
> Australian case for Iraq war was 'fabricated'
>
> ¥ So was the U.S and British case.
>
> http://www.uscrusade.com/
>

Australia generally supports the USA and UK in conflicts. In part out of
misplace sense common interests but mostly out of the need to have a
powerful allie. Everyone senses this.

Why do we need a powerful allie?

I ask you to observe the scandalous behavior of your corelgionists to non
Muslims in Timor, West Papua, the Ethnic Cleansing of large Christian
populations in Ambon and much of Indonesia.

There is nothing is hypocritical or untrustworthy as a Muslim supremacist.

Trevor Wilson · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 10

"Abu-Alwafa" wrote in message$f7.95199@localhost...
> In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
>
> Insults to Australian people Intelligence
>
> Australian intelligence on Iraq 'a clear dishonesty'
>
> ¥ This is the same 'intelligence' that the U.S and Britian used
>
> Australian case for Iraq war was 'fabricated'
>
> ¥ So was the U.S and British case.
>
> http://www.uscrusade.com/

**So, what else is new? I'll tell you what REALLY pisses me off:

The war against Saddam was illegal. No doubt about that. Why do moronic
trolls like you complain about the US (and Australia), when it is abundantly
clear that the Muslims living in Iraq are now free to follow their beliefs,
without the threat of being murdered by Saddam?

--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

GD · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 3

"Trevor Wilson" wrote in$1@news.comindico.com.au:

> when it
> is abundantly clear that the Muslims living in Iraq are now free to
> follow their beliefs, without the threat of being murdered by Saddam?

And what beliefs were these, that Muslims living under Saddam
could not follow?

Trevor Wilson · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 10

"GD" wrote in message@203.166.23.254...
> "Trevor Wilson" wrote in
> $1@news.comindico.com.au:
>
> > when it
> > is abundantly clear that the Muslims living in Iraq are now free to
> > follow their beliefs, without the threat of being murdered by Saddam?
>
> And what beliefs were these, that Muslims living under Saddam
> could not follow?

**I'm sure I don't need to explain that Saddam was part of the Sunni Muslim
group, which represents around 32% of the population. The Shia Muslims,
which represents around 65% of the population, was viciously suppressed by
Saddam.

--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

GD · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 3

"Trevor Wilson" wrote in@news.comindico.com.au:

>
> "GD" wrote in message
> @203.166.23.254...
>> "Trevor Wilson" wrote in
>> $1@news.comindico.com.au:
>>
>> > when it
>> > is abundantly clear that the Muslims living in Iraq are now free to
>> > follow their beliefs, without the threat of being murdered by
>> > Saddam?
>>
>> And what beliefs were these, that Muslims living under Saddam
>> could not follow?
>
> **I'm sure I don't need to explain that Saddam was part of the Sunni
> Muslim group, which represents around 32% of the population. The Shia
> Muslims, which represents around 65% of the population, was viciously
> suppressed by Saddam.

Yeah, I'm aware that the Shia were repressed quite viciously in the
political/power arena, but since being of the Shia belief wasnt banned,
I'm still not clear what belief they could not follow.

Gregory Shearman · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 13

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:58:40 GMT, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>
>"Abu-Alwafa" wrote in message
>$f7.95199@localhost...
>> In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
>>
>> Insults to Australian people Intelligence
>>
>> Australian intelligence on Iraq 'a clear dishonesty'
>>
>> ¥ This is the same 'intelligence' that the U.S and Britian used
>>
>> Australian case for Iraq war was 'fabricated'
>>
>> ¥ So was the U.S and British case.
>>
>> http://www.uscrusade.com/
>
>**So, what else is new? I'll tell you what REALLY pisses me off:
>
>The war against Saddam was illegal. No doubt about that. Why do moronic
>trolls like you complain about the US (and Australia), when it is abundantly
>clear that the Muslims living in Iraq are now free to follow their beliefs,
>without the threat of being murdered by Saddam?

Free to follow their beliefs, eh?

What happens if they wish to hold a Saddam support rally? You
guessed it... machinegunned by US soldiers.

--

Regards,

Gregory.

"Ding-a-Ding Dang, My Dang-a-Long Ling Long."

Gregory Shearman · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 13

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 04:18:15 GMT, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>
>"GD" wrote in message
>@203.166.23.254...
>> "Trevor Wilson" wrote in
>> $1@news.comindico.com.au:
>>
>> > when it
>> > is abundantly clear that the Muslims living in Iraq are now free to
>> > follow their beliefs, without the threat of being murdered by Saddam?
>>
>> And what beliefs were these, that Muslims living under Saddam
>> could not follow?
>
>**I'm sure I don't need to explain that Saddam was part of the Sunni Muslim
>group, which represents around 32% of the population. The Shia Muslims,
>which represents around 65% of the population, was viciously suppressed by
>Saddam.

Are you aware that Saddam's foreign minister Tariq Aziz is a christian?

The Shia Muslims WERE viciously suppressed... when they
attempted to overthrow Saddam... egged on by the USA...

What's the punishment for treason in the USA?

--

Regards,

Gregory.

"Ding-a-Ding Dang, My Dang-a-Long Ling Long."

Trevor Wilson · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 10

"Gregory Shearman" wrote in message$d6.102037@nasal.pacific.net.au...
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 04:18:15 GMT, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> >
> >"GD" wrote in message
> >@203.166.23.254...
> >> "Trevor Wilson" wrote in
> >> $1@news.comindico.com.au:
> >>
> >> > when it
> >> > is abundantly clear that the Muslims living in Iraq are now free to
> >> > follow their beliefs, without the threat of being murdered by Saddam?
> >>
> >> And what beliefs were these, that Muslims living under Saddam
> >> could not follow?
> >
> >**I'm sure I don't need to explain that Saddam was part of the Sunni
Muslim
> >group, which represents around 32% of the population. The Shia Muslims,
> >which represents around 65% of the population, was viciously suppressed
by
> >Saddam.
>
> Are you aware that Saddam's foreign minister Tariq Aziz is a christian?

**A Catholic, in fact. Yes, I was well aware of that.

>
> The Shia Muslims WERE viciously suppressed... when they
> attempted to overthrow Saddam... egged on by the USA...

**Correct.

>
> What's the punishment for treason in the USA?

**Probably Capital Punishment. The US seems to think that killing people
solves problems. It does not.

--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

Trevor Wilson · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 10

"Gregory Shearman" wrote in message$d6.101872@nasal.pacific.net.au...
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:58:40 GMT, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> >
> >"Abu-Alwafa" wrote in message
> >$f7.95199@localhost...
> >> In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
> >>
> >> Insults to Australian people Intelligence
> >>
> >> Australian intelligence on Iraq 'a clear dishonesty'
> >>
> >> ¥ This is the same 'intelligence' that the U.S and Britian used
> >>
> >> Australian case for Iraq war was 'fabricated'
> >>
> >> ¥ So was the U.S and British case.
> >>
> >> http://www.uscrusade.com/
> >
> >**So, what else is new? I'll tell you what REALLY pisses me off:
> >
> >The war against Saddam was illegal. No doubt about that. Why do moronic
> >trolls like you complain about the US (and Australia), when it is
abundantly
> >clear that the Muslims living in Iraq are now free to follow their
beliefs,
> >without the threat of being murdered by Saddam?
>
> Free to follow their beliefs, eh?

**Without being murdered by Saddam. Of course.

>
> What happens if they wish to hold a Saddam support rally? You
> guessed it... machinegunned by US soldiers.

**Has that happened? I've seen numerous rallies in support of Saddam, on the
nightly news reports. I saw no machine-gunning of any of these protests.
When did this occur? Were the protesters unarmed? Are you making up this
story?

--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

Gregory Shearman · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 13

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 22:38:17 GMT, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> >The war against Saddam was illegal. No doubt about that. Why do moronic
>> >trolls like you complain about the US (and Australia), when it is
>abundantly
>> >clear that the Muslims living in Iraq are now free to follow their
>beliefs,
>> >without the threat of being murdered by Saddam?
>>
>> Free to follow their beliefs, eh?
>
>**Without being murdered by Saddam. Of course.
>
>>
>> What happens if they wish to hold a Saddam support rally? You
>> guessed it... machinegunned by US soldiers.
>
>**Has that happened? I've seen numerous rallies in support of Saddam, on the
>nightly news reports. I saw no machine-gunning of any of these protests.
>When did this occur? Were the protesters unarmed? Are you making up this
>story?

http://www.ccmep.org/2003_articles/Iraq/043003_us_troops.htm

US troops 'shoot dead two more Iraqis'
George Wright and agencies
The Guardian
Wednesday April 30, 2003

US troops today opened fire on Iraqi civilians for the second time this week as
an angry crowd in Falluja protested over an earlier shooting.

--

Regards,

Gregory.

"Ding-a-Ding Dang, My Dang-a-Long Ling Long."