Terra Nullius - Lies and Fraud !

Neville Duguid · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 16

"fasgnadh" aka "Che Guava" aka ... lied:

> Duguid, a known slanderer, even suggests that Reynolds has
> been tried in a court when he misrepresents the academic's
> opinion as a 'juridicial analysis';
>
> "Apparently the first juridicial analysis exposing the fraudulant
> nature of Reynold's proposition was published recently in the
> Australian Financial Review."

Have you forgotten the first time you threw a whammy and wailed and
wailed that I had incorrectly attributed something to you which was
actually someone else's text you were quoting? The time I accidentally
left out a double-quote in my response?

Here you have done worse than what you make a big noise about others
doing. The 2nd quoted paragraph above was from the re-post of another
contributor's post as I clearly and correctly attributed at the start of
the text. I did not write it, and take no responsibility for the
finiicky esoteric word choice you demand of others even as you take as
much poetic licence as you like in your own posts.

Archived from group: aus>politics

Neville Duguid · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 16

"fasgnadh" aka "Che Guava" aka ... wrote:

> If you consciously and deliberately repost the lies and
> slanders of another slandering liar, without checking their
> veracity, without having the decency to check, YOU are
> EQUALLY GUILTY of, and accountable for that slander!

You contributed to this thread - the thread where the person who
actually *wrote* the post you refer to (the initial post in this thread
) initially posted it
to aus.politics and aus.education. Yet you had no comments to offer its
original author. You saved your comments for me until after I had
re-posted it in the newsgroups most appropriate to its content:
aus.history and aus.legal - where your crony Seppo Renfors immediately
bounced it back to aus.politics (belying his pretence at being genuinely
interested in legal matters). You were also contributing to other
threads in aus.politics within minutes of the original post appearing
there, and resorting to specious ad hom in order to draw attention to
its author in those threads. Yet you showed no interest in the content
of the particular post you now pretend to find so outrageous, until
after it was re-posted by myself in newsgroups you don't normally
frequent more than two days later.

When I asked that original poster if he would re-post in the two other
newsgroups, he invited me to do it for him. Rather suspicious when you
consider most posters of substantive posts want the credit for their own
research and to be involved in discussing it themselves. You had no
objection to the content of that post until *after* I had reposted it
more than two days following its initial appearance under its author's
name in aus.education and aus.politics. Obviously you saw nothing
sufficient to move you to comment on it at the time - your alleged
concern for Henry Reynolds' obviously having grown out of nowhere in the
interim.

You must think we were all born yesterday, you time-wasting
space-wasting troll.

[ plonk ! ]

Ned Latham · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 24

Peter Wicks (aka "Che Guava"), posting as "fasgnadh" wrote
in :
> Neville Duguid wrote:
> * "fasgnadh" aka "Che Guava" aka ... lied:

(Guano's forgery of Nev's attribution line undone. Text Nev neither
wrote nor quoted removed.)

> > > Duguid, a known slanderer, even suggests that Reynolds has
> > > been tried in a court when he misrepresents the academic's
> > > opinion as a 'juridicial analysis';
> > >
> > > "Apparently the first juridicial analysis exposing the fraudulant
> > > nature of Reynold's proposition was published recently in the
> > > Australian Financial Review."
> >
> > Have you forgotten the first time you threw a whammy and wailed and
> > wailed that I had incorrectly attributed something to you which was
> > actually someone else's text you were quoting? The time I accidentally
> > left out a double-quote in my response?
> *
> * Here you have done worse than what you make a big noise about others
> * doing. The 2nd quoted paragraph above was from the re-post of another
> * contributor's post as I clearly and correctly attributed at the start of
> * the text. I did not write it, and take no responsibility for the
> * finiicky esoteric word choice you demand of others even as you take as
> * much poetic licence as you like in your own posts.
>
> Your only defence to the clear charges that you have
> slandered Henry Reynolds is that you have previously
> falsely attributed a quote to someone else and then
> attacked them for it? Astonishing gall!

Did you forget to read the paragraph you snipped, lunatic?

Oh, of course not: you snipped it so you could lie about the
one preceding it.

> You really are an intellectual and moral bankrupt!

As the Che Guano FAQ says:

> * 2.11. Why do you call him a lunatic?
> *
> * He shows signs of paranoid schizophrenia: his posts are
> * frequently self-referential, some with delusional boasts
> * of what he thinks is grandeur and/or complaints of
> * persecution; he attributes others' virtues to himself and
> * projects his own villainies onto others; ...

----snip----

Ned
--
True Blue FAQ:
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ http://www.keyserver.net/en/
Fingerprint: D17C FDD5 BBA8 8687 42E3 C8F2 C9FB 0314 E17A 0CD7

Ned Latham · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 24

Peter Wicks (aka "Che Guava"), posting as "fasgnadh" wrote
in :

----snip----

> Arguing with slimy scum such as Duguid

ROTFL! Gauno's finally learnt to use "such as" instead of "like"
to defend himself against having his slimy accusations turned
back on him where they belong.

And it only took twenty iterations of the lesson, too (here's an
example):

> * > rabid racists like
> * > Enlightenment, Stan Pierce, Tripper, Mosley, Ned Latham, Neville
> * > Duguid, Putzl, Kamper Van Axle Grease,
> *
> * No they don't. As you demonstrate all too plainly.
> *
> * "Of course, recent cultural influences, especially American sexual
> * infantilism has seen a dramatic rise in anglo pedophiles, and even
> * mature women seek to look like little girls to satisfy the warped
> * Anglo apetites".

My, oh my. You sure are a *fast* learning little lunatic, aincha?

> is like peeling back the
> layers of an onion, as each level of his bullshit is rebutted,
> he retreats into yet another level of desperate obfuscation,
> each more feeble than the one he has just abandoned and snipped.

As the Che Guano FAQ says:

> * 2.11. Why do you call him a lunatic?
> *
> * He shows signs of paranoid schizophrenia: his posts are
> * frequently self-referential, some with delusional boasts
> * of what he thinks is grandeur and/or complaints of
> * persecution; he attributes others' virtues to himself and
> * projects his own villainies onto others; ...

----snip----

Ned
--
True Blue FAQ:
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ http://www.keyserver.net/en/
Fingerprint: D17C FDD5 BBA8 8687 42E3 C8F2 C9FB 0314 E17A 0CD7