Promoting Scientology Into Our Schools, Colleges and Univers

coffeecup · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 11

And promoting L.Ron Hubbard, our ever true and smiling friend as well,
with word clearing
and study tech, and a proper understanding of the brain-mind-spirit
interface, consciousness,
truth, understanding, affinity or love and communication.

We can all be better off without Psychiatry that chemical butchery of
our children, of our
friends, of our relatives, without that fale study on human
interrerelationships and ego,
which is Psychology.

We can all be friends, and be good partners in life, with L.Ron Hubbard
and Scientology
technology. Just think you too, can be as happy as Thomas Mapover IV,
or any of these
bright high flying Scientologist friends.

Please read Ron's book 'The Way To Happiness' to get a real feel for
what Scientology
is about.

Archived from group: aus>education

coffeecup · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 11

I happen to think, believe and trust in that Psychiatry is a dangerous
and
deadly chemical, electrical, physical brain medical practise. Many of
the
drugs prescribed by psychiatrists in hospitals, clinics and
institutions
cause a number of various contraindictions that all reveal damage to
the
brain, to the neurology of the patient. I think, believe and trust
that I am
a spiritual being, and that Psychiatry does not consider me so. To
Psychiatry I am nothing more than a neurological collection of brain
cells, functioning as a consciousness. The damage that Psychiatry &
psychiatrist can do by promoting a false belief, by acting on a false
belief,
by providing their false and harmful medications and treatments is
incalcuable in society, in our community. Scientology is the only
religious
practise that acknowledges this, and challenges this, and fights this,
even
in the courts. Scientology is the only applied religious philosophy
that
is willing to face up to the falsehoods of Psychiatry. Many religions
don't
do this, they accept this brain based chemical and electrical treatment
profession as a necessity in the community, without truly understanding
the implications of doing so, in doing so they are denying their own
spirituality,
and their own religion, by not taking positive action against
Psychiatry, and
psychiatrists, against governments (including the Australian
Government)
that support these debilitating, dangerous, deadly and injurious
treatments/
offenses against their patients/victims; they are denying their own
religious
rights and beliefs. These are soft religions, Scientology is a hard
religion.
I am not a Scientologist by the way, but believe in the creed of the
Anti-
Psychatrist, which has been around for decades, long before
Scientology.

Don H · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 187

wrote in message@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> And promoting L.Ron Hubbard, our ever true and smiling friend as well,
> with word clearing
> and study tech, and a proper understanding of the brain-mind-spirit
> interface, consciousness,
> truth, understanding, affinity or love and communication.
>
> We can all be better off without Psychiatry that chemical butchery of
> our children, of our
> friends, of our relatives, without that fale study on human
> interrerelationships and ego,
> which is Psychology.
>
> We can all be friends, and be good partners in life, with L.Ron Hubbard
> and Scientology
> technology. Just think you too, can be as happy as Thomas Mapover IV,
> or any of these
> bright high flying Scientologist friends.
>
> Please read Ron's book 'The Way To Happiness' to get a real feel for
> what Scientology
> is about.
>
# Scientology is not "science", but a religion, as it itself agrees - "The
Church of Scientology" was established in Victoria, when the State
government of the day (Henry Bolte; 1950s?) passed the Psychological
Practices Act. Scientology skipped out from under, by becoming a religion.
Yes, it has a sacred book, and a revered founder, and the E-meter is roughly
equivalent to the Catholic confessional.
Psychiatry may not be the ultimate answer to human mental problems, but
Behaviourism, and Psychology and Brain Surgery, etc. - all have more
potential for real progress in human knowledge, than the theories of
Scientology. The study of human evolution, from reflex, instinct,
intelligence, to rational thought, is the way to go.
Let Scientology push its wares, like any other creed, but not by
indoctrination of the young; there are enough competitors in that field
already.
Any creed which feels it has to survive by indoctrination, has already
conceded defeat.

Don H · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 187

wrote in message@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> I happen to think, believe and trust in that Psychiatry is a dangerous
> and
> deadly chemical, electrical, physical brain medical practise. Many of
> the
> drugs prescribed by psychiatrists in hospitals, clinics and
> institutions
> cause a number of various contraindictions that all reveal damage to
> the
> brain, to the neurology of the patient. I think, believe and trust
> that I am
> a spiritual being, and that Psychiatry does not consider me so. To
> Psychiatry I am nothing more than a neurological collection of brain
> cells, functioning as a consciousness. The damage that Psychiatry &
> psychiatrist can do by promoting a false belief, by acting on a false
> belief,
> by providing their false and harmful medications and treatments is
> incalcuable in society, in our community. Scientology is the only
> religious
> practise that acknowledges this, and challenges this, and fights this,
> even
> in the courts. Scientology is the only applied religious philosophy
> that
> is willing to face up to the falsehoods of Psychiatry. Many religions
> don't
> do this, they accept this brain based chemical and electrical treatment
> profession as a necessity in the community, without truly understanding
> the implications of doing so, in doing so they are denying their own
> spirituality,
> and their own religion, by not taking positive action against
> Psychiatry, and
> psychiatrists, against governments (including the Australian
> Government)
> that support these debilitating, dangerous, deadly and injurious
> treatments/
> offenses against their patients/victims; they are denying their own
> religious
> rights and beliefs. These are soft religions, Scientology is a hard
> religion.
> I am not a Scientologist by the way, but believe in the creed of the
> Anti-
> Psychatrist, which has been around for decades, long before
> Scientology.
>
# Having had some experience with psychiatrists, due to relatives being
schizophrenic,or depressed, I don't hold with the idea that all is as bad as
you allege.
Of course, if people study medicine and similar because they are well-paid
professions, then it is as well to slightly cynical about resultant
treatment - and seldom have I known a psychiatrist to completely cure a
patient (though in one case of depression, Prozac worked wonders).
However, psychiatrists and psychologists tend to fulfil the role in the
modern world which used to the sole prerogative of priests (hearing
confession). A person can unburden their soul to the long-suffering
"shrink", often for the prescribed Medicare fee. This, in itself, has a
therapeutic effect.
I agree that there is a tendency to over-prescribe medication in the
modern world; every specialist has some drug which you simply must take -
when a change of life-style, to include less stress, sound sleep, good diet,
regular exercise, etc - might prove more beneficial.
If you are on a dozen pills per day, then you are the walking dead, as
they'll kill you off eventually.
It is unfortunate that many mental hospitals were on prime pieces of land;
hence the rationalisation that patients were better off being looked after
by relatives or the community, so the politicians could flog off the land to
their real estate mates. Hence, the cops, not known for great subtlety,
tend to shoot first when confronted by some disturbed individual in the
public domain.

coffeecup · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 11

You have accepted then the credo of the professional, and
professionalism.
You have accepted then the credo that religions are rather gooey
edifices of phony beliefs.
You have accepted then that all professionals act in the best interests
of those they serve.
You have accepted then that religions have no real place in society,
apart from some passive relief and guidance.
You have accepted then that market forces, have not infiltrated
professionalism, especially in the medical community.
You have accepted then the false propaganda of those in control of
mental health that they are serving the best
interest of their clients.

I am writing mostly about certain specific drugs, and medications, and
the general attitude to mental illness by these professionals.
I am writing mostly about a certain religion, apart from those that you
have been exposed to.

I contend that mental health is merely a corporate industrial
pharmaceutical entity.
I contend that most religions don't bare responsibility for those who
chose to take up their guidance.

I contend the Australian Federal Commonwealth Government, under the
laws of the Crown of England stand
for commercial interests, and not real, true, and correct, deeply
philosophical and religious concepts, understandings,
truisms and liberty of the soul, and grace of the spirit.

(have only a short time to write my speel, this time)

coffeecup · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 11

I feel the very real need to promote Scientology to all and sundry on
this newsgroup.
I wish you could all find out more about Scientology, and use it in
your daily lives to
improve your mental, emotional, and spiritual stamina and productivity!

criminal punishment>
you, I'm naming you>
me, tut tut tut tut>

coffeecup · Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 11

The chief reason I feel, that make Scientology incompatible with most
people's
belief system is that Scientology is a covert organization. All it's
acts, are
associated with secrets, and confidences, it operates of making people
hide
things from each other. This reveals itself as a control operation,
Scientology
seeks to control it's members, and any organization that does that is
not
about 'freedom' or 'freedom of information' it is about reducing
'freedom' and
reducing 'freedom of information'. Scientology acts as somekind of
secret
police force operations, some kind of covert paramilitary operations in
some
ways. I don't see this 'Scientology' as being much more than a force
of darkness
in the world. That scientologists use the black marks in the books,
that Psychiatry
has collected against them, and in so doing seeks to achieve ticks on
it's side
of the ledger is just symptomatic of Scientology not being able to do
what it
says it can do, that is 'free' people.