EducationForumz.com Forum Index
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Homer & Shrek

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    EducationForumz.com Forum Index -> Education in Australia
Author Message
Don H



Joined: 05 Aug 2007
Posts: 187

PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:46 am    Post subject: Homer & Shrek Reply with quote

The federal Opposition was toying with the idea of banning the nexus twixt
popular cartoon characters and fast food outlets.
Seems they've dropped the idea, but I don't think they need worry too
much, especially if it is Homer Simpson and Shrek who are involved.
What have we here? An Oaf and an Ogre, and if they aren't exactly
anti-heroes, then they're hardly inspirational, both being overweight and
thus not exactly a promo for fast foods.
Are fast foods necessarily bad? Only if consumed too much and too often,
as you might get a surplus of carbohydrate ie. not commensurate with your
physical activity.
Fast foods are - fast. The service is prompt and quick, but not
necessarily cheap, nor unduly nutritional. But not to be condemned.
If parents are pestered by their children to buy the product for the
ancillary toys on offer, then they may indulge their offspring, but only up
to a point - then it is time to put the foot down with a firm hand.
What is Homer's symbol? the donut (or doughnut); a pure CHO foodstuff,
which has no core, but only non-core; surely of some nutritional
significance.
However, it can have a moral:
"As you ramble through life, brother,
Whatever be your goal,
Keep your eye upon the doughnut,
And not upon the hole."
But any diet should have a basic core of essential foods, while allowing
for a 1% dissipation margin (Lelord Kordel), ie. lollies, soft drinks, etc).

Archived from group: aus>education
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Don H



Joined: 05 Aug 2007
Posts: 187

PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:54 pm    Post subject: Re: Homer & Shrek Reply with quote

"Andy" wrote in message$2ium$1@otis.netspace.net.au...
> Hi Don,
>
> I read your posts in aus.education with great interest, and always agree
> with what you say.
> Not sure if you saw this in the weekend papers.
>
> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22187857-2862,00.html
>
> Andy (retired primary school teacher)
>
>
# Thanks for the kind words, and info. I've printed off the article and
note the failure in maths, grammar, and punctuation - as well as spelling.
I buy "The Age" daily, except Saturday (when there's too much to throw
away), then I might opt for the W/E "Australian", or not purchase at all.
I'm outside the education system, so can only compare my own schooldays
with modern outcomes. Do schools still have "inspectors"? I remember them
coming, from time to time; they'd sit at back of the class and watch a
teacher in action.
I assume each level of grade or class had a fixed curriculum, and a
standard to be met. Also, most kids were expected to pass each year, and
only "kept down" in exceptional circumstances.
As to grammar and punctuation, this was taught systematically, and I
quite liked the process of parsing and sentence analysis.
Punctuation? Not needed said a teacher to the inspector, who then wrote
on the blackboard:
---The teacher says the inspector is a fool.----
He then punctuated....
---"The teacher," says the inspector, "is a fool".
But let's not quibble about who is, or is not, foolish, the aim is to
solve the problem.
Literacy should not be much of a problem if tackled systematically.
English is not as phonetic as some other languages, eg. Spanish, but it does
have a rational set of rules, if you care to study them. True, there are
quite a number of exceptions and other anomalies, but the basics are
sensible enough - even for primary students to grasp.
Teach the Alphabet, use a Primer, and teach the basic Rules, and you're
well on your way.
If Rudolf Flesch can teach a kid to read and write in six weeks, then why
can't the average teacher in school? (See his book: "Why Johnny Can't
Read"; Harper & Row; NY; first published in the 1950s and still going
strong - unfortunately!) I might disagree with some aspects of Flesch's
approach, but that's merely a personal opinion, and I'm no expert.
Literacy means "knowledge of letters", and if you can't analyse a word
into its component letters, and make sense of them, ie. can't spell; then,
whatever else you may be, you're not literate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Andy



Joined: 05 Aug 2007
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:11 am    Post subject: Re: Homer & Shrek Reply with quote

Hi Don,

I read your posts in aus.education with great interest, and always agree
with what you say.
Not sure if you saw this in the weekend papers.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22187857-2862,00.html

Andy (retired primary school teacher)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
a t e c 7 7



Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:43 am    Post subject: Re: Homer & Shrek Reply with quote

Andy wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> I read your posts in aus.education with great interest, and always agree
> with what you say.
> Not sure if you saw this in the weekend papers.
>
> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22187857-2862,00.html
>
> Andy (retired primary school teacher)
>
>
Ahh anal retentive

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    EducationForumz.com Forum Index -> Education in Australia All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group